ISO 14001 Standards – Complying with Environmental Laws and Regulations

One of the most commonly cited reasons for implementing an ISO 14001 environmental management system is that it helps an organization comply with environmental laws and regulations.

ISO 14001 registration will provide additional assurance to City Council, senior management, regulators and key stakeholders that appropriate procedures have been implemented to identify, track, and communicate environmental laws and regulations. ISO 14001 registration will also provide assurance that our Administration is controlling, monitoring, and improving performance, relative to these laws/regulations.

A strong environmental management system, aimed at legal/regulatory compliance, will serve the City of Edmonton by increasing the likelihood of avoiding convictions, fines and judgments; avoiding internal legal costs; and promoting positive relations with regulators.

What is a “document” In ISO 9001 Standard?

What is a “document” In ISO 9001 Standard?

The following are some of the main objectives of an organization’s documentation, independent of whether or not it has implemented a formal QMS;
a) Communication of Information as a tool for information transmission and communication. The type and extent of the documentation will depend on the nature of the organization’s products and processes, the degree of formality of communication systems and the level of communication skills within the organization, and the organizational culture.
b) Evidence of conformity provision of evidence that what was planned, has actually been done.
c) Knowledge sharing to disseminate and preserve the organization’s experiences. A typical example would be a technical specification, which can be used as a base for design and development of a new product.
A list of commonly used terms relating to documentation is presented in Annex A (taken fromISO 9000:2005). It must be stressed that, according to ISO 9001:2008 clause 4.2 Documentation requirements documents may be in any form or type of medium, and the definition of “document” in ISO 9000:2005 clause 3.7.2 gives the following examples:
paper
magnetic
electronic or optical computer disc
photograph
master sample

ISO 14001 Standards Audit

ISO 14001:2004 emphasizes the continuous improvement of an environmental management system (EMS). The standard specifies requirements for an environmental management system to enable an organization to develop and implement a policy and objectives which take into account legal requirements and information about significant environmental aspects. The certification process ensures the conformance of your EMS against the international standard, as well as any organizational specific requirements that have been identified.

The ISO 14001 Standards audit consist of 2 stage registration audit process followed by surveillanceaudits, and ultimately a recertification audit. ISO 14001 Audits include on-site assessments of documents, data, records, activity and personnel. Process audit trails are followed by interviews of personnel responsible for the tasks and reviewing associated activity and records of occurrence. The audit trail will follow interactions between processes as well as the details of the process itself. Following are the stages of the audit process.

Pre-assessmentRegistration Audit – Stage 2Audit Findings• A review of action taken on nonconformities identified during the previous audit• A review of the continued effectiveness of the management system in its entiretyThe continued applicability to the scope of registration

The pre-assessment audit is an optional activity, outside of the registration process, it is highly encourages that any organization to undertake to evaluate the readiness to undergo the two stage registration process. That would optimally occur prior to the stage 1 and 2 audits.

Unlike the Stage 1 and Stage 2 activities you have full discretion as to which areas the preassessment should focus on and for the length of the pre-assessment. This activity allows your organization to become familiar with the audit process and helps prepare your employees for the registration assessment.

The auditor conducting the pre-assessment will typically return to the organization for the assessment. Similar to a ‘true’ audit, the end result of the pre-assessment will be a documented report identifying findings observed during the audit and a closing meeting to discuss the issues.

The pre-assessment activity allows you to correct any issues prior to beginning the registration process.

Assessment

New requirements for certification bodies have changed the registration process. Registration is now conducted in two distinct visits- Stage One and Stage Two- each of which has defined requirements that are outlined below.

Registration Audit – Stage 1

The stage 1 audit, conducted at your facility, is primarily performed for planning and determining the readiness of an organization to undergo a stage 2 registration audit. It also facilitates communicating any needs and expectations to the organization. Activities performed at a stage 1 audit include:

• Conducting a documentation review – This review determines if the organization’s EMS documentation adequately covers all the requirements of the ISO standard

• A review of the aspects and impacts and their significance and an evaluation of the facility(s) site specific conditions

• A review of your organizations non-conformance, preventive and corrective action system • An overview of applicable regulations

• Interviewing your organization’s personnel to assess their general readiness to undertake a stage 2 audit

• Confirming the applicability of the scope of the organization’s EMS

• Obtaining evidence that internal audits and management reviews are being planned and performed

• Providing focus for the planning of the stage 2 audit

If during the stage 1 audit any nonconformities are identified, the auditor will request a corrective action response (see Corrective Action Response).

The objective of the Stage 2 on-site audit is to assess your organizations’ adherence to your own policies, objectives, and procedures and to ascertain conformance to the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard. To accomplish this, the audit will address the implementation of all the elements of the standard. Review of documentation and records to support the implementation is an expected part of the assessment process. If non-conformances or opportunities for improvement are identified they will be documented in a report which will be presented to the organization during the closing meeting. The report will include the auditor’s recommendation regarding registration.

Any deviation from procedures or requirements of the standard will be identified as an audit finding, which will be documented in the audit report. The auditor will draw your attention to non-conformities as they arise so there will be no “surprises” at the closing meeting. Findings are categorized into three categories defined as follows:

• A major non-conformity relates to the absence or total breakdown of a required process or a number of minor non-conformities listed against similar areas. A major non-conformity at the Registration Audit – Stage 2 would defer recommendation for registration until that major has been closed.

• A minor non-conformity is an observed lapse in your systems ability to meet the requirements of the standard or your internal systems, while the overall process remains in tact.

• An observation or opportunity for improvement relates to a matter about which the Auditor is concerned but which cannot be clearly stated as a non-conformity. Observations also indicate trends which may result in a future non-conformity.

Corrective Action Response

ISO 14001 Standards requires corrective action responses from all Registration Audits. Once certification is achieved, dependant upon the extent and nature of the findings, your organization may be required to submit a corrective action plan, detailing your intent to correct the non conformity.

The auditor may also recommend that your organization submit objective evidence to support the to verify closure may be required.

It is recommended that all non-conformities are addressed within your internal corrective action system. Typically, opportunities for improvement would be addressed as preventive actions by your organization.

closure of the finding. In certain circumstances such as a major non conformity an on site activity

Surveillance Audits

Company shall conduct Surveillance Audits on an annual or semi-annual basis. The purpose of the Surveillance Audit is to ensure that the EMS continues to conform to both the organizations’ and the ISO 14001 requirements. Certain processes will be reviewed at each surveillance including:

• Internal audits and management review

• Customer and interested parties communications

• Effectiveness of the management system in achieving defined objectives

• The progress of planned continual improvement activities

• Continuing operational control

• A review of any changes made by the organization which may have impact on the registration

• Use of accreditation and certification body logos provided to the organization upon registration

• objectives, targets and programs

• evaluation of compliance

Re-assessment Audits

The accreditation body requires that a recertification audit be carried out every three years. The purpose of the recertification audit is to confirm the continued conformity and effectiveness of the management system as a whole, and its continued relevance and applicability for the scope of activity.

Recertification audits review the performance of the EMS over the registration period, and include a review of previous surveillance audit records. The recertification audit includes the following:

• The continued relevancy of the organization’s policy and objectives

• The continued effective interaction between the processes of the management system

• A review of internal audits, management reviews, document changes during this certification period

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.

Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.

General Description of ISO14001 Standards

General Description of ISO14001 Standards

ISO14001 Standards requires an Environmental Policy to be in existence within the organisation, fully supported by senior management, and outlining the policies of the company, not only to the staff but to the public. The policy needs to clarify compliance with Environmental Legislation that may effect the organization and stress a commitment to continuous improvement. Emphasis has been placed on policy as this provides the direction for the remainder of the Management System.

Those companies who have witnessed ISO9000 Assessments will know that the policy is frequently discussed during the assessment, many staff are asked if they understand or are aware of the policy, and any problems associated with the policy are seldom serious. The Environmental Policy is different, this provides the initial foundation and direction for the Management System and will be more stringently reviewed than a similar ISO9000 policy. The statement must be publicised in non-technical language so that it can be understood by the majority of readers. It should relate to the sites within the organisation encompassed by the Management System, it should provide an overview of the company’s activities on the site and a description of those activities. A clear picture of the company’s operations.

The preparatory review and definition of the organization’s environmental effects is not part of a ISO14001 Assessment, however examination of this data will provide an external audit with a wealth of information on the methods adopted by the company. The preparatory review itself should be comprehensive in consideration of input processes and output at the site. This review should be designed to identify all relevant environmental aspects that may arise from existence on the site. These may relate to current operations, they may relate to future, perhaps even unplanned future activities, and they will certainly relate to the activities performed on site in

the past (i.e. contamination of land).

The initial or preparatory review will also include a wide-ranging consideration of the legislation which may effect the site, whether it is currently being complied with, and perhaps even whether copies of the legislation are available. Many of the environmental assessments undertaken already have highlighted that companies are often unaware of ALL of the legislation that affects them, and being unaware, are often not meeting the requirements of that legislation.

The company will declare its primary environmental objectives, those that can have most environmental impact. In order to gain most benefit these will become the primary areas of consideration within the improvement process, and the company’s environmental program. The program will be the plan to achieve specific goals or targets along the route to a specific goal and describe the means to reach those objectives such that they are real and achievable. TheEnvironmental Management System provides further detail on the environmental program. The EMS establishes procedures, work instructions and controls to ensure that implementation of the policy and achievement of the targets can become a reality. Communication is a vital factor, enabling people in the organisation to be aware of their responsibilities, aware of the objectives of the scheme, and able to contribute to its success.

As with ISO 9000 the Environmental Management System requires a planned comprehensive periodic audit of the Environmental Management System to ensure that it is effective in operation, is meeting specified goals, and the system continues to perform in accordance with relevant regulations and standards. The audits are designed to provide additional information in order to exercise effective management of the system, providing information on practices which differ to the current procedures or offer an opportunity for improvement.

In addition to audit, there is a requirement for Management Review of the system to ensure that it is suitable (for the organization and the objectives) and effective in operation. The management review is the ideal forum to make decisions on howe to improve for the future.

What Is ISO 14001 Standards?

What Is ISO 14001 Standards?

ISO 14001 is primarily concerned with Environmental Management. In plain language, this means what the organization does to minimize harmful effects on the environment caused by its activities.

Improving the environmental performance of corporations is one way of limiting environmental damage. Environmental management systems (EMSs), such as ISO 14001, provide a framework for organizations that wish to effectively manage their environmental affairs. Implementing an EMS that conforms to the ISO 14001 standard may help businesses integrate environmental values into their operations.

An EMS can be described as a program of continuous environmental improvement that follows a defined sequence of steps drawn from established project management practice and routinely applied in business management. In simple terms these steps are as follows:
• Review the environmental consequences of the operations.
• Define a set of policies and objectives for environmental performance.
• Establish an action plan to achieve the objectives.
• Monitor performance against these objectives.
• Report the results appropriately.
• Review the system and the outcomes and strive for continuous improvement.
Not every system will present these steps in exactly the same way, but the basic principles are clear and easily understandable.

The ISO 14000 series is a series of standards for different aspects of environmental management. A number of these standards relating to environmental management systems have been adopted formally by the members of the ISO, while others are in different stages of preparation.

The Challenge Of ISO 14001 Standards

The Challenge Of ISO 14001 Standards

The building blocks of an environmental management system is an understanding of aspects and impacts.

Implementing ISO 14001 begins with identifying how an organisation’s business activities impact on the

environment.

Many organisations believe they are already aware of the significant aspects and impacts of their operations.

The process of implementing ISO 14001 may uncover significant impacts not previously identified and allows

for a consistent approach to analysis.

Generally this analysis is done department by department or centre by centre.

It is best if it is a team approach that involves the employees who do the activity. An employee’s

familiarity with a task is essential for both the identification of the environmental impacts of business

activities and the determination or implementation of control measures.

An aspect is any element of an organisation’s activities, products or services that can interact with the

environment.

An impact is the change caused to the environment.

Impacts may occur during normal and abnormal operating conditions, such as accidents and emergencies.

Aspects can often be isolated by analysing the inputs and outputs of an activity.

EVALUATION OF IMPACTS

Once the impacts have been determined they have to be evaluated.

Criteria for evaluation include environmental concerns such as the severity of the impact, and business

concerns such as potential regulatory and legal exposure, the probability of the impact occurring, the

cost of changing the impact and effect on public image.

This type of evaluation highlights the significant impacts. These, in turn, determine the significant

aspects. Once the significant aspects have been determined, targets and objectives can be set.

ISO 14001 Standards Certification

ISO 14001 Standards Certification

ISO 14001 sets out a system that can be audited and certified. In many cases, it is the issue of certification that is critical or controversial and is at the heart of the discussion about the trade implications.

The standard allows for “self-certification,” a declaration by an enterprise that it conforms toISO 14001. There is considerable skepticism as to whether this approach would be widely accepted, especially when certification has legal or commercial consequences. At the same time, obtaining certification can entail significant costs, and there are issues relating to the international acceptance of national certification that may make it particularly difficult for companies in some countries to achieve credible certification at a reasonable cost. For firms concerned about having certification that carries real credibility, the costs of bringing in international auditors are typically quite high, partly because the number of internationally recognized firms of certifiers is limited at present.

The issue of accreditation of certifiers is becoming increasingly important as the demand increases.

The ISO has outlined procedures for accreditation and certification (Guides 61 and 62), and a formal body, QSAR, has been established to operationalize the process. At the same time, a number of established national accreditation bodies heavily involved in ISO have set up the informal International Accreditation Forum (IAF) to examine mechanisms for achieving international reciprocity through multilateral agreements (MLAs). However, these systems are in the early stages, and many enterprises continue to use the established international certifiers, even at additional cost, because of lack of confidence in the acceptability of local certifiers.

Given the variability in the design of individual EMS and the substantial costs of the ISO 14000 certification process, there is a growing tendency for large companies that are implementing EMS approaches to pause before taking this last step. After implementing an EMS and confirming that the enterprise is broadly in conformance with ISO 14001, it is becoming routine to carry out a “gap analysis” to determine exactly what further actions would be required to achieve certification and to examine the benefits and costs of bringing in third-party certifiers.

Certification means that a qualified body (an “accredited certifier”) has inspected the EMS system that has been put in place and has made a formal declaration that the system is consistent with the requirements of ISO 14001.Countries that have adopted ISO 14001 as a national standard can accredit qualified companies as certifiers, and this will satisfy national legal or contractual requirements. However, the fundamental purpose of ISO is to achieve consistency internationally. If certificates from certain countries or agencies are not fully accepted or are regarded as “second class,” the goal will not have been achieved. It is probable that the international marketplace will eventually put a real commercial value on high-quality certificates, but this level of sophistication and discrimination has not yet been achieved. It is essential to the ultimate success of the whole system that there be a mechanism to ensure that certification in any one country has credibility and acceptability elsewhere.

Environmental Aspects In ISO 14001 Standards EMS

Environmental Aspects In ISO 14001 Standards EMS

First make lists of the environmental aspects (issues) that are relevant

to the business. The environmental review mentioned earlier should

provide most of this information and the Annex to ISO 14001 provides

guidance on the format for doing this.

Consider the inputs, outputs and processes/activities of the business in

relation to;

a) emissions to air

b) releases to water

c) waste management

d) contamination of land

e) use of raw materials and natural resources

f) other local environmental and community issues

Consider both site (direct) and offsite (ie. indirect) aspects that you

control or have influence over (such as suppliers) and in relation to

normal operations, shut-down and start-up conditions and reasonably

foreseeable and emergencies situations

A simple written procedure is then required to determine which of the

aspects identified are really or probably significant (important) and should

therefore be managed by the EMS. This process which is

similar to health and safety risk assessment ranks the aspects by order

of importance and the significant aspects identified are then the core

of the environmental management system.

There are various methods of determining significance but most are

based on the principle of attributing a relative value for the

environmental hazard or potential to cause harm (eg. on a scale of 1-

5) and the risk or likelihood of occurrence (eg. on a scale of 1-5). The

relative significance is then determined by multiplying the hazard by

the risk. (eg. max score of 25). An arbitrary but cautious threshold

value is then set above which environmental aspects are considered to

be significant. This threshold can be determined by a common sense

consideration of the aspects identified.